Patient outcomes after fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without coronary revascularization capability.

نویسندگان

  • Rajendra H Mehta
  • Douglas A Criger
  • Christopher B Granger
  • Karen K Pieper
  • Robert M Califf
  • Eric J Topol
  • Eric R Bates
چکیده

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) treated with fibrinolytic therapy in hospitals with and without coronary revascularization capability. BACKGROUND Patients with MI may have better outcomes when admitted to certain hospitals with coronary revascularization capability. Development of regional heart care centers for the treatment of MI has been proposed. METHOD We performed a retrospective analysis of 25,515 U.S. patients enrolled in the Global Use of Streptokinase and TPA (alteplase) for Occluded Coronary arteries (GUSTO)-I trial. Outcomes of patients admitted to hospitals with and without coronary revascularization capability were analyzed. We also analyzed patients who remained in hospitals without coronary revascularization capability compared with those transferred to hospitals with revascularization capability. RESULTS Baseline characteristics and complications were similar between patients in the two hospital types. Patients in hospitals with coronary revascularization capability more often underwent cardiac catheterization (78.1% vs. 59.2%; p < 0.001), angioplasty (34.6% vs. 22.6%; p < 0.001), or bypass surgery (14.1% vs. 10.4%; p < 0.001) but had a similar adjusted 30-day (odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 82 to 1.02) and one-year (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.07) mortality. Forty percent of patients admitted to hospitals without revascularization capability were transferred, with 94% of transfer patients undergoing angiography. Almost 80% of transfers occurred >48 h after hospital admission. CONCLUSION Patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute MI admitted to hospitals without coronary revascularization capability appear to have outcomes similar to those of patients admitted to hospitals with such capability when aspirin and beta-adrenergic blocking agents are given appropriately and transfer is available for angiography and angioplasty as needed.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evaluating long-term outcomes of coronary angioplasty with or without post-dilatation

Introduction: Post-dilatation is associated with a simultaneous expansion of the stents that enhances the angioplasty outcomes. However, increased risk of mortality and morbidity has been reported in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) which has provoked considerable controversies concerning its efficiency. Materials and Methods: During a two-...

متن کامل

Angioplasty strategies in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: part II: intervention after fibrinolytic therapy, integrated treatment recommendations, and future directions.

As reviewed in part I of this report,1 primary PCI without antecedent fibrinolytic therapy has become widely accepted as the preferred reperfusion modality for patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting at suitably equipped tertiary facilities. However, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not offered at 50% of US hospitals, and many of those that...

متن کامل

Interhospital transfers among Medicare beneficiaries admitted for acute myocardial infarction at nonrevascularization hospitals.

BACKGROUND Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who are admitted to hospitals without coronary revascularization are frequently transferred to hospitals with this capability, yet we know little about the basis for how such revascularization hospitals are selected. METHODS AND RESULTS We examined interhospital transfer patterns in 71 336 AMI patients admitted to hospitals without re...

متن کامل

Payments for acute myocardial infarction episodes-of-care initiated at hospitals with and without interventional capabilities.

BACKGROUND It is unknown whether hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capability provide costlier care than hospitals without PCI capability for patients with acute myocardial infarction. The growing number of PCI hospitals and higher rate of PCI use may result in higher costs for episodes-of-care initiated at PCI hospitals. However, higher rates of transfers and postacute ca...

متن کامل

Thrombolytic therapy vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT Trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and thrombolytic therapy for treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI) suggest primary PCI is the superior therapy, although they differ with respect to the durability of benefit. Because PCI is often limited to hospitals that have on-site cardiac surgery programs, most acute MI patients do not have access to this the...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

دوره 40 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002